Loss of opportunities in the diagnosis and treatment of primary obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (POAPS): from theory to reality.

OBJECTIVES: (I) To identify and measure the clinical consequences of a delayed diagnosis in patients with primary obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (POAPS), in terms of time and events associated to antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and (II) to evaluate the impact of their treatment status on perinatal outcomes, before and after diagnosis. METHODS: This retrospective multicentre study included 99 POAPS women who were separated in two groups of timelines based on their diagnostic status: group 1: women who met the clinical criteria for POAPS; group 2: included the same patients from group 1 since they meet the laboratory criteria for APS. In group 1, we assessed the following variables: obstetric events, thrombotic events and time (years) to diagnosis of APS. We also compared perinatal outcomes between patients in group 1 vs. group 2. Women in group 2 were treated with standard of care for POAPS. Simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Regarding the impact of the delay on diagnosis, a total of 87 APS-related events were recorded: 46 miscarriages, 32 foetal losses and 9 premature deliveries before the 34th week due to preeclampsia, and one thrombosis. The estimated rate of preventable events was 20.58 per year/100 patients. The mean diagnostic delay time was 4.27 years. When we compared both groups during pregnancy, we found that patients in group 1 (no treatment) had a higher association with pregnancy losses [OR = 6.71 (95% CI: 3.59-12.55), p < 0.0001]. CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasize the negative impact of POAPS underdiagnosis on patient health and the critical importance of a timely intervention to improve pregnancy outcomes. Key Points •Our study shows the relevance of underdiagnosis on primary obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (POAPS). •These patients presented a high risk of APS-related events with each passing year. •Shorter diagnostic delay time was observed in the reference centres.

[Kidney disease in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome]. / Manifestations rénales du syndrome des anticorps antiphospholipides.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by recurrent arterial and venous thromboembolic events. Renal complications occur in 3 % of patients. Renal artery stenosis is the most common, and APS-related nephropathy is the predominant microvascular complication. APS nephropathy has heterogeneous manifestations ranging from hematuria and non-nephrotic range proteinuria to hypertension and multi-organ failure caused by catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Anticoagulation and thromboprophylaxis are key to management. Immunosuppression has been used with some success but lacks randomized controlled trial validation for their use.

Le syndrome des anticorps antiphospholipides (SAPL) est une maladie auto-immune rare caractérisée par des événements thromboemboliques artériels et veineux récurrents. Les complications rénales surviennent chez 3 % des patients. La sténose de l'artère rénale est la plus courante et la néphropathie liée au SAPL représente la complication microvasculaire principale. La maladie rénale liée au SAPL se traduit par des manifestations hétérogènes allant de l'hématurie et de la protéinurie non néphrotique à l'hypertension jusqu'à la défaillance multi-organique causée par le syndrome catastrophique des anticorps antiphospholipides (SCAPL). L'anticoagulation et la thromboprophylaxie sont clés dans la prise en charge. L'immunosuppression a été utilisée avec un certain succès, mais manque de validation par des essais contrôlés randomisés pour leur utilisation.

Evaluation of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) affects approximately 5% of couples. Although RPL definitions vary across professional societies, an evaluation after a second clinically recognized first-trimester pregnancy loss is recommended. Good quality evidence links parental chromosomal rearrangements, uterine anomalies, and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) to RPL. In contrast, the relationship between RPL and other endocrine, hematologic, and immunologic disorders or environmental exposures is less clear. Anticoagulant therapy and low-dose aspirin are recommended for patients with RPL who have also been diagnosed with APS. Vaginal progesterone supplementation may be considered in patients experiencing vaginal bleeding during the first trimester. Surgical correction may be considered for patients with RPL in whom a uterine anomaly is identified. Evaluation and management of additional comorbidities should be guided by the patient's history rather than solely based on the diagnosis of RPL, with the goal of improving overall health to reduce complications in the event of pregnancy. Most people with RPL, including those without identifiable risk factors, are expected to achieve a live birth within 5 years from the initial evaluation. Nevertheless, clinicians should be sensitive to the psychological needs of individuals with this condition and provide compassionate and supportive care across all stages.

A case of repeated in-stent restenosis of coronary artery as a primary manifestation of seronegative antiphospholipid antibody syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is a multisystemic autoimmune disorder which affects many organs or systems; however, coronary artery is relatively less frequently involved. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old female with effort chest pain was hospitalized for unstable angina in Janurary, 2015. Coronary angiography revealed sub-total occlusion of proximal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery, where a drug-eluting stent was successfully deployed. The patient experienced multiple in-stent stenosis at LAD coronary artery and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery was advised. Subsequently, severe stenosis of left circumflex (LCX) coronary artery emerged, and the patient suffered persistent in-stent restenosis. Eventually, the patient was diagnosed with seronegative antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and salvaged by immunosuppressants. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated in-stent restenosis could be a primary manifestation of seronegative antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, and suppression of autoimmune activity and inflammation other than purely coronary revascularization might be a better option.

Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Unlike classic APS, CAPS causes multiple microthrombosis due to an increased inflammatory response, known as a "thrombotic storm". CAPS typically develops after infection, trauma, or surgery and begins with the following symptoms: fever, thrombocytopenia, muscle weakness, visual and cognitive disturbances, abdominal pain, renal failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Although the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in the blood is one of the diagnostic criteria, the level of these antibodies can fluctuate significantly, which complicates the diagnostic process and can lead to erroneous interpretation of rapidly developing symptoms. Triple therapy is often used to treat CAPS, which includes the use of anticoagulants, plasmapheresis, and high doses of glucocorticosteroids and, in some cases, additional intravenous immunoglobulins. The use of LMWH is recommended as the drug of choice due to its anti-inflammatory and anticoagulant properties. CAPS is a multifactorial disease that requires not only an interdisciplinary approach but also highly qualified medical care, adequate and timely diagnosis, and appropriate prevention in the context of relapse or occurrence of the disease. Improved new clinical protocols and education of medical personnel regarding CAPS can significantly improve the therapeutic approach and reduce mortality rates.

Choroidal involvement in patients with catastrophic anti-phospholipid syndrome: Two case reports.

PURPOSE: To describe choroidal involvement in catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS). METHODS: We report here two cases of bilateral CAPS choroidopathy in two female patients. RESULTS: Case report 1: A thirty-five-year-old female patient, with history of primary anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS), treated with anticoagulants, presented an acute renal failure following a salpingectomy. She complained of bilateral acute blurred vision. Ophthalmologic evaluation revealed visual acuity (VA) of 5/10, extensive serous retinal (SRD) detachment, areas of hypofluorescence on fluorescein angiography (FA), and non-perfusion areas in the choriocapillaris, on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A), in both eyes. Considering the diagnosis of probable CAPS, the patient received intravenous pulse steroids, plasmapheresis, intravenous anticoagulation and haemodialysis, with favourable evolution. Case report 2: A thirty-three-year-old female patient, with history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and secondary APS, treated with corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents and anti-coagulation, presented a myocardiac infarction. She complained of bilateral acute blurred vision. Ophthalmologic evaluation revealed VA of 1/10 in the RE and 6/10 in LE, bilateral extensive SRD, leakage points on FA and non-perfusion areas in the choriocapillaris on OCT-A. Criteria of probable CAPS were fulfilled. Treatment with intravenous pulse steroids, anticoagulation and reanimation modalities allowed VA improvement. Alveolar haemorrhage and cardiogenic shock led to fatal evolution. CONCLUSION: Our case reports highlight the importance of early diagnosis and ophthalmic evaluation in CAPS. Multidisciplinary approach and rapid initiation of effective treatment, based on corticosteroids, anticoagulation and plasmapheresis, allow better vital and visual prognosis.

How I diagnose and treat antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy.

ABSTRACT: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by arterial, venous, or microvascular thrombosis, pregnancy morbidities, or nonthrombotic manifestations in patients with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies. These antibodies bind cellular phospholipids and phospholipid-protein complexes resulting in cellular activation and inflammation that lead to the clinical features of APS. Our evolving understanding of APS has resulted in more specific classification criteria. Patients meeting these criteria should be treated during pregnancy according to current guidelines. Yet, despite treatment, those positive for lupus anticoagulant have at least a 30% likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Patients with recurrent early miscarriage or fetal death in the absence of preeclampsia or placental insufficiency may not meet current classification criteria for APS. Patients with only low titer anticardiolipin or anti-ß(2)-glycoprotein I antibodies or immunoglobulin M isotype antibodies will not meet current classification criteria. In such cases, clinicians should implement management plans that balance potential risks and benefits, some of which involve emotional concerns surrounding the patient's reproductive future. Finally, APS may present in pregnancy or postpartum as a thrombotic microangiopathy, a life-threatening condition that may initially mimic preeclampsia with severe features but requires a very different treatment approach.

How to diagnose and manage antiphospholipid syndrome.

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are autoimmune antibodies directed toward phospholipids or phospholipid-protein complexes, particularly those containing ß2-glycoprotein I (ß2GPI). Persistently positive aPL accompanied by arterial or venous thrombosis, or recurrent pregnancy loss, constitutes the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Several types of aPL with different specificities have been defined and may be detected in the clinical lab, including lupus anticoagulants (detected using clotting assays) and anticardiolipin, anti-ß2GPI and anti-prothrombin/phosphatidylserine antibodies (detected by ELISA); each of the last 3 aPL may be either IgG, IgM, or IgA, though IgA antibodies are not included in criteria for APS. Due to the relative rarity of APS and the heterogeneity of aPL, thrombosis risk stratification is challenging, and randomized clinical trials for thrombosis treatment and prevention have been limited. This lack of high-quality data has made the clinical management of APS difficult, and existing guidelines are few and could not possibly cover many of the scenarios encountered in managing patients with APS. In this review, we present 3 patients with aPL and/or APS who highlight treatment dilemmas, and we discuss background information that may help guide clinical judgment in developing individualized treatment plans for patients with these enigmatic antibodies.

Forecasting the Future of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Prospects and Challenges.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune condition affecting young patients, primarily women, negatively impacting their quality of life. APS is under-recognized and underdiagnosed and can have devastating results if untreated, mainly due to uncontrolled thrombosis. Research in the past decades has led to several breakthroughs with important implications for clinical practice. Here, we summarize the state of APS diagnosis, treatment, pathophysiology, and research directions that hold promise for advancing diagnosis and treatment.

Síndrome antifosfolípidos catastrófico en México. Revisión de la bibliografía / Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome in Mexico. Literature review

El síndrome antifosfolípidos catastrófico (SAFC) es una entidad rara. Se han reportado aproximadamente 600 casos en todo el mundo, y se desconoce la prevalencia en México. Objetivo: Conocer la prevalencia estimada de SAFC en México. Material y métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica de casos clínicos aislados o series de casos en los diversos buscadores, utilizando los términos «síndrome antifosfolípidos catastrófico» y «México», en mayo de 2022. Resultados: Encontramos una serie de casos retrospectivos en necropsias que incluyeron 12 casos, dos reportes que incluyeron 2 casos cada uno, y también se encontraron reportes de 11 casos clínicos aislados; estas publicaciones se generaron entre 2003 y 2020. En total, se tienen datos de 27 casos de SAFC, de los cuales 16 corresponden al síndrome antifosfolípidos primario, 10 en asociación con lupus eritematoso sistémico y 1 caso de esclerosis sistémica. La tasa de prevalencia estimada en la población mexicana en 2022 es de 2 casos por cada 10.000.000 de habitantes. La mortalidad estimada fue del 68% en esta serie de casos. Conclusión: Los casos de SAFC en México están subreportados; sin embargo, identificarlos ayudará a mejorar las estrategias diagnósticas y terapéuticas que se utilizan actualmente en el país, incentivando la implementación de la triple terapia y, en casos refractarios, el uso de eculizumab, para reducir la mortalidad actual. (AU)

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is a rare entity, approximately 600 cases have been reported around the world, and the prevalence in Mexico is unknown. Objective: To determine the estimated prevalence of CAPS in Mexico. Material and methods: A literature search of isolated clinical cases or case series was conducted in diverse search engines, using the terms: «catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome» and «Mexico» in May 2022. Results: We found a series of retrospective cases in autopsies that included 12 cases, two reports that included 2 cases each, and reports of 11 isolated clinical cases; these publications were generated between 2003 and 2020. In total, we collected data on 27 cases of CAPS, of which 16 correspond to primary antiphospholipid syndrome, 10 are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus, and 1 case corresponds to systemic sclerosis. The estimated prevalence rate in the Mexican population in 2022 is 2 cases per 10,000,000 inhabitants. The estimated mortality was 68% in this case series. Conclusion: Cases of catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome in Mexico are underreported; identifying them will help improve current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies used in the country, encouraging the implementation of triple therapy and, in refractory cases, the use of eculizumab, to reduce current mortality. (AU)

Antiphospholipid syndrome in cardiovascular disease and cancer.

Antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune disorder which is characterized by the presence of heterogeneous antiphospholipid antibodies. There is an evidence on antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies related to thromboembolic events in cancer patients. In fact, the thrombotic complications in patients with malignancy occur at a rather high frequency, compared to other risk factors. In parallel with standard therapies available, there is need of case-by-case monitoring of each patient and the introduction of new therapies and need for more clinical trials which will address many questions for the optimal management of patients. This paper presents a basic review of the literature on the aPL antibodies associated with cardiovascular disease and cancer, as well as its complications, which are reported so far in the bibliography.

French National Diagnostic and Care Protocol for antiphospholipid syndrome in adults and children.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a chronic autoimmune disease involving vascular thrombosis and/or obstetric morbidity and persistent antibodies to phospholipids or certain phospholipid-associated proteins. It is a rare condition in adults and even rarer in children. The diagnosis of APS can be facilitated by the use of classification criteria based on a combination of clinical and biological features. APS may be rapidly progressive with multiple, often synchronous thromboses, resulting in life-threatening multiple organ failure. This form is known as "catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome" (CAPS). It may be primary or associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (associated APS) and in very rare cases with other systemic autoimmune diseases. General practitioners and paediatricians may encounter APS in patients with one or more vascular thromboses. Because APS is so rare and difficult to diagnosis (risk of overdiagnosis) any suspected case should be confirmed rapidly and sometimes urgently by an APS specialist. First-line treatment of thrombotic events in APS includes heparin followed by long-term anticoagulation with a VKA, usually warfarin. Except in the specific case of stroke, anticoagulants should be started as early as possible. Any temporary discontinuation of anticoagulants is associated with a high risk of thrombosis in APS. A reference/competence centre specialised in autoimmune diseases must be urgently consulted for the therapeutic management of CAPS.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome (CAPS): A Rare Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) may be the first manifestation ("de novo") of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) or a complication in the clinical course of patients known to have this syndrome. Approximately 40% of patients had an associated autoimmune disease, mainly, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The trigger can be one of the following: infections, surgical interventions, neoplasms, pregnancy, discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment, and others. CAPS is a medical emergency in which early identification and prompt initiation of aggressive therapy is extremely important. According to the Guidelines for the use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice developed by the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA), last updated in April 2023, in CAPS, the indication for therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is category I, grade 2C. CASE REPORT: We present a case of probable CAPS secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in an elderly patient in whom clinical and biological improvement was achieved through a multidisciplinary approach and prompt initiation of TPE. Because TPE is considered first-line therapy in CAPS, we initiated the procedure as soon as the attending rheumatologist raised this suspicion. Four plasmapheresis sessions were performed in the Intensive Care Unit. We used TPE by membrane filtration. Following the therapeutic intervention with TPE, corticotherapy (Solumedrol in puls-therapy), cyclophosphamide and anticoagulant treatment, the evolution was favourable, with clinical and biological improvement. CONCLUSION: The prompt initiation of TPE, because of the suspicion of CAPS, increases the chances of a favourable evolution.

Investigation and Management of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Comprehensive Review of Guidelines.

Importance: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is one of the most frustrating clinical entities in reproductive medicine requiring not only diagnostic investigation and therapeutic intervention, but also evaluation of the risk for recurrence. Objective: The aim of this study was to review and compare the most recently published major guidelines on investigation and management of RPL. Evidence Acquisition: A descriptive review of guidelines from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, and the German, Austrian, and Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics on RPL was carried out. Results: There is consensus among the reviewed guidelines that the mainstays of RPL investigation are a detailed personal history and screening for antiphospholipid syndrome and anatomical abnormalities of the uterus. In contrast, inherited thrombophilias, vaginal infections, and immunological and male factors of infertility are not recommended as part of a routine RPL investigation. Several differences exist regarding the necessity of the cytogenetic analysis of the products of conception, parental peripheral blood karyotyping, ovarian reserve testing, screening for thyroid disorders, diabetes or hyperhomocysteinemia, measurement of prolactin levels, and performing endometrial biopsy. Regarding the management of RPL, low-dose aspirin plus heparin is indicated for the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome and levothyroxine for overt hypothyroidism. Genetic counseling is required in case of abnormal parental karyotype. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, and the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians guidelines provide recommendations that are similar on the management of cervical insufficiency based on the previous reproductive history. However, there is no common pathway regarding the management of subclinical hypothyroidism and the surgical repair of congenital and acquired uterine anomalies. Use of heparin for inherited thrombophilias and immunotherapy and anticoagulants for unexplained RPL are not recommended, although progesterone supplementation is suggested by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the German, Austrian, and Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Conclusions: Recurrent pregnancy loss is a devastating condition for couples. Thus, it seems of paramount importance to develop consistent international practice protocols for cost-effective investigation and management of this early pregnancy complication, with the aim to improve live birth rates.

Positive antiphospholipid antibodies: observation or treatment?

Antiphospholipid antibodies (APLAs) are  primarily directed toward phospholipid-binding proteins and are responsible for thrombotic events. APLAs include anti-ß2Glycoprotein I (anti-ß2GPI), anticardiolipin (anti-CL) antibodies, and lupus anticoagulant. These antibodies are typical markers of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and are a part of its diagnostic criteria. Many data underline the presence of APLAs in other rheumatic diseases (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, Sjögren's syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis and Behçet's disease). However, they are also detected in patients with cancer, infection, and neurological disorders. Furthermore, healthy individuals may be carriers of APLAs. Chronic asymptomatic APLAs presence is most common in the elderly and subjects with chronic diseases (including malignancies). Specific kinds of APLAs are considered markers of oncological progression. These antibodies occur in 6% of pregnant women (without diagnosed APS) and are related to many pregnancy complications. Of worth, various types of APLAs are reported to have different prothrombotic properties. The risk of thrombotic events in APLA-positive but clinically naïve patients raises many questions in clinical practice. This manuscript analyses various clinical situations and consequences of the APLAs' presence, particularly in patients without diagnosed APS. The prevalence, etiology, molecular background, and prothrombotic properties of numerous APLAs are broadly discussed. The new management approach in different clinical conditions and organ complications is present in the context of recent recommendations. Discussed data underlines that adequate and timely introduced thromboprophylaxis can decrease the risk of thrombus formation and prevent increased morbidity.

Hemorrhage complications in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: Risk factors and association with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Background: Bleeding complications are recognized as relatively infrequent manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and the safety of antithrombotic therapy during pregnancy is of concern. This study aims to assess the risk factors and possible associations between bleeding complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) in patients with APS. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Peking University People's Hospital. The clinical and immunologic features, bleeding complications, treatment, and pregnancy outcomes of patients with APS were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to assess the associations between APOs and bleeding complications. Results: A total of 176 participants with obstetric APS were included in the analysis. There were 66 (37.50%) patients with APS with hemorrhage complications and 86 (48.86%) patients with APS with APOs. Mucocutaneous hemorrhage was associated with APOs including fetal death after 12 weeks [odds ratio (OR) = 10.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.61-71.74, p = 0.014], preterm delivery prior to 34 weeks (OR = 8.30, 95% CI: 2.31-29.84, p = 0.001), and small for gestational age (OR = 4.17, 95% CI: 1.22-14.21, p = 0.023) in univariate logistic regression analyses. It also independently associated with preterm delivery prior to 34 weeks (OR = 40.29, 95% CI: 1.45-1121.32, p = 0.030) in multivariate logistic regression analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis evaluating the accuracy of these factors for preterm delivery prior to 34 weeks showed that the area under ROC curve was 0.871. Conclusion: The study shows that mucocutaneous hemorrhage may be an indication of the occurrence of APOs in obstetric patients with APS.

Successful Pregnancy with SLE-associated Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Case Report.

Pregnancy in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Risk is significantly increased when SLE pregnancy is complicated by anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS). Here, we present a case of a 21 year-old multi-gravid lady with SLE- associated APS who was diagnosed as such when she presented with multisystem flare at her 16 weeks of gestation. At presentation she had fever, multiple joint pain in both upper and lower limbs, loss of hair, history of recurrent oral ulcer, skin rash over hand and feet. Physical examination and laboratory evaluation were consistent with an active SLE flare. A diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was made based on her clinical presentation and laboratory findings. The reported patient had APS secondary to SLE. She had all the risk factors that would confer a remarkably high risk of pregnancy morbidity: positive anti-SSA(RO) antibody and lupus anticoagulant, history of one neonatal death due to congenital heart block and two consecutive first trimester pregnancy loss. Multidisciplinary management approach with appropriate intervention and close monitoring can bring a successful outcome.

Retinal vein occlusion. Audit of a specialized care program.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most frequent cause of retinal vascular disease and is related to classic cardiovascular risk factors. A specific program was designed to detect and treat risk factors in patients with RVO. The aim of this study is to audit the results of this program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The program consisted of a multidisciplinary clinical evaluation by the Ophthalmology and Internal Medicine Departments. All patients with RVO were screened, at minimum, for hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking, overweight, and antiphospholipid syndrome. New risk factors or poor control of known risk factors were expected to be found in at least one-third of the patients. Among them, therapeutic measures were expected to be taken in at least two-thirds. A dissociated automated search of the data of all patients who entered the program between April 2021 and April 2022 was performed. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included for analysis. Of these, 39 (69.6%) had at least one new or poorly controlled risk factor and 43 (76.8%) had their treatment modified in some way. Antiphospholipid syndrome was detected in five (8.9%). Only one patient had low-risk hereditary thrombophilia. After an exhaustive examination, no risk factors were found in 11 patients. CONCLUSION: This specific program has been effective in detecting new or poorly controlled risk factors and improving their treatment.

Inflammatory and thrombotic valvulopathies in autoimmune disease.

Rheumatologic diseases are characterised by loss of immune tolerance, resulting in systemic inflammation. Inflammation and scarring of the endocardium, which lines the inner surface of the heart chambers and valves, can result in valvular thickening and dysfunction. Estimates of prevalence vary depending on the sensitivity of the screening methodology used and range from 30%-50% in systemic lupus and rheumatoid arthritis to 10%-30% in ankylosing spondylitis. Progression of valve disease is a slow process but can result in haemodynamically significant complications. Thromboembolic complications such as cerebrovascular occlusions pose a serious risk of morbidity. The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies increases the risk of valvular disease and thrombotic complications. Anticoagulation is recommended in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, but the guidance on the role of immunosuppressive therapy to treat valvular disease is lacking. Surgical valve therapy may be considered in severe disease, but there is increased risk in patients with an autoimmune disease which includes a higher risk of infection, thromboembolic and bleeding complications, as well as cardiovascular events in the setting of premature atherosclerotic heart disease. Therefore, management should be provided in a multidisciplinary team that includes a rheumatologist, a cardiologist and a cardiothoracic surgeon; medical therapy should be optimised before considering a high-risk valve surgery.